[Cdn-DMCA] Napster North
Tom Trottier
Tom at Abacurial.com
Mon May 6 02:30:48 EDT 2002
On Sunday, May 05, 2002 at 21:58, Michael Geist <canada-dmca-
opponents at flora.org>
wrote re "Re: [Cdn-DMCA] Napster North" saying:
> >Tangentially, I noted that you commented on Napster in another
> >column (21 March) stating that "making personal copies through
> >services such as Napster does not constitute copyright infringement
> >since users already pay for that right through the levy". This is not
> >correct. The exemption in s. 80(1) specifically contemplates and
> >excludes distribution or communication to the public by
> >telecommunication in s. 80(2).
> >
>
> The act of copying a song off the Napster system is neither
> distribution nor communication for the party that does the copying.
> Those Napster users that make those same songs available for others to
> copy would not be covered and I never claimed that they were. Anytime
> I have been asked about this, I have said that a Napster user could
> lawfully copy the song but could not make that song available to
> others. The quote you refer to is similarly limited -- it refers to
> making personal copies, not to making those songs available to others.
So it's legal for the copier but not the copi-ee (for copyrighted
material).
Tom
------- Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur -----------------
,__@ Tom A. Trottier +1 613 860-6633 fax:231-6115
_-\_<, 758 Albert St.,Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7V8
(*)/'(*) ICQ:57647974 N45.412 W75.714
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Laws are the spider's webs which,
if anything small falls into them they ensnare it,
but large things break through and escape.
--Solon, statesman (c.638-c558 BCE)
--
For (un)subscription information, posting guidelines and
links to other related sites please see http://www.flora.org/dmca/
More information about the Discuss
mailing list