[Cdn-DMCA] Copyright bill universally rejected --- onward to consumer bill of rights

[Tom Trottier]

And in photographs, subjects have some rights, too.

Tom

On Wednesday, April 17, 2002 at 9:45, Kal Lin <canada-dmca-
opponents at flora.org>
wrote re "Re: [Cdn-DMCA] Copyright bill universally rejecte" saying:

> On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Kristofer Coward wrote:
> 
> > > Having written that, "creators" springs to mind.
> > 
> > Creators is good.
> 
> I suggest using more accurate terms that everyone 
> understands to avoid confusion and sharpen the discourse, 
> even if it means typing a few extra words.
> 
> authors = people who write books
> recording artists = people who record music
> song writers = people who write songs
> programmers = people who write code
> photographers = people who take pictures
> etc.
> 
> It's quite conceivable that recording artists and song
> writers should be treated differently with respect to
> copyright laws.  

------- Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur -----------------
   ,__@	Tom A. Trottier +1 613 860-6633 fax:231-6115
 _-\_<,	758 Albert St.,Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7V8	
(*)/'(*)	ICQ:57647974 N45.412 W75.714
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Laws are the spider's webs which, 
if anything small falls into them they ensnare it, 
but large things break through and escape.
	--Solon, statesman (c.638-c558 BCE)

--
For (un)subscription information, posting guidelines and
links to other related sites please see http://www.flora.org/dmca/